“In some states, clients are charged court costs and attorney’s fees, based on the worth of their probate assets. Thus, the cost of the administration of the estate increases, as the value of the probate estate increases.”
This is just one of the reasons people think they want a trust: to ensure that the value of their overall estate will not decrease, because of the cost of probate. The most common way to do that is with a trust, says The Houston Chronicle in the article “Elder Law: Which should I have—A Living trust or a will?”
In some states, probate is not an expensive or overly time-consuming issue. Texas, for example, has what is called an independent administration. Executors handle the tasks involved in settling an estate and distributing assets to beneficiaries. As a result, there’s very little court involvement. However, that’s not the case everywhere. In California, the Probate Court closely supervises the entire probate process and no assets can be distributed without the Court’s approval. Further, in California, probate costs are 5% to 7% of the gross value of the estate. For instance, if your estate is $1 million, the probate costs can be as high as $50,000. If you want to avoid probate costs, you should hire an estate planning attorney. An experienced estate planning attorney can tell you whether a trust is right for your estate. He or she can also explain the difference between different types of trusts.
The trust most frequently used to avoid probate, is known as a revocable management trust, living trust or an “inter vivos” trust.
Selecting the best type of trust for each situation is different. Here are some advantages of living trusts:
Avoiding probate. The cost of probate alone is not reason enough to use a trust. However, if your assets are in trusts, you may not need to file an inventory listing your assets with the court. That’s not always required in every jurisdiction, but if it is required where you live, a trust can help keep your asset list private, by ensuring that it is only seen by beneficiaries.
Asset management for incapacity. A living trust goes into effect, while you are alive. If you become incapacitated, an alternate trustee can step in to manage assets, pay bills and ensure that finances are taken care of.
Avoiding probate in another state. If you own out-of-state property, your estate may need to be probated in your home state and in the other state. If you have a living trust, out-of-state parcels of land can be deeded into the trust during your lifetime, thus avoiding the need for probate in another state. After your passing, your trustee can handle the out-of-state property in the living trust.
Administrative ease. There are, unfortunately, instances when Power of Attorney can be challenged by financial institutions. The authority of a trustee is more likely to be recognized, by banks, investment companies, etc.
There are some questions about whether it’s better to have a living trust or a will. The most complex part of having a living trust, is the process of funding the trust. It is imperative for the trust to work, that every asset you own is either transferred into the trust or retitled into the name of the trust. If assets are left out or incorrectly funded, then probate will probably be necessary. This can occur, even if only one single asset is left out.
If an asset is controlled by beneficiary designation, then the trust may not need to be named a beneficiary, should you want it to pass directly to one or more beneficiaries.
Funding the trust becomes complicated, when retirement accounts are involved. Consult with an experienced estate planning attorney, if you want to make the trust a designated beneficiary of a retirement account. This is because very specific and complex rules may limit the ability to “stretch” the distributions form the account.
Using a trust instead of a will-based plan is growing in popularity, but it should never be an automatic decision. An estate planning attorney will be able to explain the pros and cons of each strategy and help you and your family decide which is better for you.
Reference: The Houston Chronicle (Feb. 15, 2019) “Elder Law: Which should I have—A Living trust or a will?”
“在某些州,客戶需要按資產的價值去支付法庭費用和律師費。因此,隨著資產增值, 遺囑認證費用亦隨著增加。”
這是人們認為他們需要信託的其中一個原因:確保他們的財產總值不會因為遺囑認證的費用而減少。The Houston Chronicle在“Elder Law: Which should I have—A Living trust or a will?”
一文中說,最常見的方法就是建立信託。
在某些州,遺囑認證並不花費及耗時。例如,德州擁有所謂的獨立的遺產程序。執行人員處理解決遺產和向受益人分配資產。因此,法院很少參與。但不是到處都是這樣。在加州,遺囑認證法院密切監督整個遺囑認證過程,未經法院批准,不得分配任何資產。此外,在加州,遺囑認證費用佔遺產總值的5%至7%。例如,如果您的遺產是100萬美元,那麼遺囑認證費用可高達50,000美元。如果您想避免遺囑認證費用,您應聘請資產規劃律師。經驗豐富的資產規劃律師可以告訴您信託是否適合您。也可以跟您解釋不同類型的信託之間的差異。
最常用於避免遺囑認證的信託稱為生前信託。
因著不同的情況選擇最合適的信託。以下是生前信託的一些好處:
避免遺囑認證。遺囑認證的費用不是使用信託的唯一原因。另一個原來是,如果您把資產放到信託中,您便可能無需向法院提交資產清單。並非每個司法管轄區都要求這樣做,但如果您所在的地方需要,可以通過信託確保只有受益人才看到您的資產清單。
失去能力管理資產。當你還在世的時候,生前信託便生效。如果您失去能力,替代受託人可以介入管理您的資產,支付賬單並確保財務得到妥善處理。
在另一個州避免遺囑認證。如果您在外州擁有財產,您的遺產可能需要在您所居地和其他州認證。如果你有一個生前信託,那麼可以把在外州的地放到信託中,這樣便可避免在另一個州進行遺囑認證。在您去世後,您的受託人可以處理在信託中的於外州的物業。
容易管理。不幸的是,有很多情況下,財務授權書可被一些金融機構質疑。而受託人的權力更有可能被銀行,投資公司等承認。
關於擁有生前信託還是擁有遺囑好一些這問題。擁有生前信託最複雜的部分是把資產注入信託的過程。如果要令信託有效,您擁有的所有資產都要轉移到信託中或是重新命名為信託名下。如果忘了轉移資產或不正確地轉移,則可能需要進行遺囑認證。即使只剩下一個資產,也可能發生這種情況。
如果資產有指定受益人,而您希望把資產直接留給指定受益人,那麼, 信託就不需要成為指定受益人。
當涉及退休賬戶時,為信託注入資金會變得複雜。如果您想將信託作為退休賬戶的指定受益人,請諮詢經驗豐富的資產規劃律師。因為當中涉及複雜的規則。
以信託來取代遺囑的做法越來越受歡迎,但這並不是理所當然的。資產規劃律師將能夠解釋每種策略的利弊,並幫助您和您的家人決定哪種方案更適合您們。
參考: The Houston Chronicle (Feb. 15, 2019) “Elder Law: Which should I have—A Living trust or a will?”