Fong Law Group

Should you omit your children’s names in your trust if you don’t want to leave anything to them?

 

如果不想留財產給子女，應否在信託剔除子女的名字?

如果不想留財產給子女，應否在信託剔除子女的名字

Savings for Seniors: Lower Medicare Part B Premiums in 2023

For the first time in more than 10 years, Medicare Part B enrollees will see some of their costs decline. In an announcement issued by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the agency outlined changes to the premium, deductible, and co-payment amounts for numerous Medicare costs taking effect in 2023.

• Medicare Part B basic monthly premium = $164.90 = Savings of about $62 for the year
   
• Medicare Part B annual deductible = $226 = Savings of $84 for the year
   
• Other amounts, meanwhile, will rise slightly in 2023:
   
  • Medicare Part A deductible = $1,600 (up from $1,556)
  • Co-payment for hospital stay, days 61 to 90 = $400 per day (up from $389)  
  • Co-payment for hospital stay, days 91 and beyond = $800 per day (up from $778)
  • Co-payment for skilled nursing facility, days 21 to 100 = $200 per day (up from $194.50)

Note that beneficiaries with higher incomes pay higher monthly premiums. For further details, read the news release from CMS.

If you wish to make changes your coverage, Medicare’s Open Enrollment Period will take place October 15 through December 7. 

Comparing Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage

Recent research by the Kaiser Family Foundation examined the differences between traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage. While people in either program were similarly satisfied with their care and overall care coordination, some distinctions became apparent.

Traditional Medicare’s Strengths

Traditional Medicare is a federal health insurance program for adults 65 and older and individuals with disabilities. Medicare Part A covers hospital fees, Part B applies to medical expenses, and Part D involves prescriptions.

The Foundation reviewed 62 studies released since 2016. The research findings revealed the following:

• Beneficiaries of traditional Medicare were more likely to receive cancer care in higher-quality hospitals.
• They also tended to get superior care in skilled nursing facilities and home health agencies compared with their Medicare Advantage counterparts.
• Traditional Medicare recipients may be less likely to have problems related to expenses.

Findings on Benefits of Medicare Advantage

Medicare Advantage is an alternative to traditional Medicare. It offers plans encompassing Part A hospital fees, Part B medical expenses, and Part D medicine. In some cases, the cost of Medicare Advantage can be lower, but not always. Privately owned companies contract with Medicare to provide Medicare Advantage.

According to the study:

• Some research indicated that Medicare Advantage had slightly better preventive services, providing increased access to routine health checkups, screenings, and vaccinations.
• Patients with Medicare Advantage were more likely to have a consistent health care provider.
• Medicare Advantage had lower hospital readmission rates, received more information during care transitions, and had more favorable experiences getting prescription drugs.

Switching Rates

The researchers looked at the rates at which people switched programs as a way of understanding program dissatisfaction. Medicare Advantage had a higher switching rate relative to traditional Medicare. Yet both had a low turnover, possibly suggesting that people tended to be satisfied with both programs.

Switching from Medicare Advantage to standard Medicare was more common among:

• people of color
• residents of rural areas
• those eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid
• individuals who experienced a health impairment that affected their daily functioning

Cost Issues

Beneficiaries of traditional Medicare reported higher rates of cost difficulties than enrollees in Medicare Advantage. Yet recipients of conventional Medicare with supplemental coverage had the lowest rates of expense complaints overall.

Seek Professional Guidance

Since each plan’s benefits and drawbacks can depend on individual circumstances, consider speaking to your elder law attorney before enrolling. They can explain the differences between these programs and help you plan for retirement.

What Are Medicaid Asset Protection Trusts?

Medicaid imposes strict rules on how much money and assets an applicant can have. To qualify for Medicaid, you must fall under the asset limit, which is $2,000 in most states.

Even with greater than $2,000 in assets, however, you may be able to get on Medicaid by establishing a Medicaid Asset Protection Trust (MAPT). When you put your assets in a MAPT, Medicaid will not count the money in the trust toward its resource limit.

Using Medicaid Asset Protection Trusts to Transfer Assets

After you create a Medicaid Asset Protection Trust, you no longer own the assets within it, allowing you to qualify for Medicaid following the five-year lookback period. People who are currently healthy but plan to go on Medicaid in the future might choose to use this Medicaid planning strategy.

It is essential to understand that MAPTs are irrevocable: Once you make the trust, you cannot change your mind and take those assets back. Your trust must be irrevocable for you to qualify for Medicaid because it means that you no longer own or control these assets.

In contrast to MAPTs, many types of revocable trusts, such as family trusts, are often ineffective in preparing for Medicaid. Having the power to revoke your trust would allow to retain control over your assets, and Medicaid would count the contents of your trust as part of your resources.

Creating a Medicaid Asset Protection Trust

Three parties are involved in a MAPT: the grantor, the trustee, and the beneficiary. When you make a trust, you become the grantor, the person who places assets into the trust. The trustee manages the trust, and the beneficiary — or beneficiaries — will receive your assets.

If you want your MAPT to ensure you qualify for Medicaid, you must name someone other than yourself or your spouse as the beneficiary. Designating yourself as the beneficiary would mean giving yourself assets, which Medicaid would count toward its asset limit.

You can, however, select your children or parents as beneficiaries. Using a MAPT, you can also make sure they get those assets when you pass away.

What Can You Place in a Medicaid Asset Protection Trust?

As part of your Medicaid planning strategy, you can place many types of assets in a MAPT, including:

• Checking and savings accounts
• Stocks and bonds
• Mutual funds
• Certificates of deposit
• Real estate that is not your primary residence
• In most states, your home

Although many states allow you to place your home in MAPT so that it will not count toward Medicaid’s resource limit after five years, Medicaid regulations vary by state. In Michigan, for example, placing your home in a MAPT will not prevent it from counting toward the asset limit.

Benefits and Drawbacks of Medicaid Asset Protection Trusts

Medicaid Asset Protection Trusts offer several benefits to individuals planning to apply for Medicaid:

• MAPTs preserve generational wealth, safeguarding assets for family members.
• After you pass away, the state cannot take your assets from your beneficiaries to reimburse them for your long-term care, as MAPTs avoid probate.
• Since nursing home fees can be exorbitant, MAPTs can save your family money, as they let you qualify for Medicaid once the lookback period has ended.

The drawbacks of MAPTs include the following:

• Once you establish a MAPT, you forfeit the control and use of your assets. If you need money, you will not be able to draw from the trust.
• The fees associated with preparing a MAPT can be costly, ranging from $2,000 to $12,000.

Speak with your attorney to learn about how using a Medicaid Asset Protection Trust could help you plan for your future.

Medicare Advantage Plans Often Wrongly Deny Necessary Care, Study Finds

In an alarming number of instances, private Medicare Advantage plans are denying coverage for medical services that would be covered under original Medicare, according to a federal investigation.  These denials are likely preventing or delaying medically necessary care for tens of thousands of Medicare Advantage beneficiaries each year.

The investigation by the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General found that 13 percent of Medicare Advantage plan denials should have been covered under Medicare.  The findings were based on a review by doctors and coding experts of service denials by 15 of the largest Medicare Advantage plans during the first week of June 2019.   Extrapolating from their findings, investigators estimate that nearly 85,000 beneficiary requests for medical care -- everything from MRIs to skilled nursing facility care -- could have been wrongly denied in 2019.

In an even higher proportion of cases, plans are incorrectly refusing to pay claims. Nearly one-fifth of claims that Medicare Advantage plans initially declined to pay were for services that met Medicare coverage and plan billing rules.  This translates to an estimated 1.5 million refused payments for all of 2019, delaying or blocking payments for services that providers had already delivered.

Hidden Barriers to Care

Some 26 million Medicare beneficiaries were in Medicare Advantage plans as of 2021, more than double the figure a decade ago.  The Congressional Budget Office projects that by 2030 more than half of Medicare beneficiaries will be in a private Medicare plan. Unlike original Medicare, where the federal government is the insurer, Medicare Advantage plans are run by private insurance companies. The government pays the plans a fixed monthly fee to provide services to each Medicare beneficiary under their care. The less money the plans spend on patient care, the more they and their investors make. In this way, plans have an incentive to keep costs down.

For many beneficiaries, Medicare Advantage plans’ most disagreeable cost-cutting strategy is “preauthorization” -- the common requirement that doctors and other medical providers obtain the plan's approval before a beneficiary can receive certain medical services. If the plan administrators disagree that a procedure is medically necessary, the plan may refuse to pay for it.

Medicare Advantage plans often look attractive because they offer the same basic coverage as original Medicare at a seemingly lower cost, plus some additional benefits and services like vision and dental care that traditional Medicare doesn't offer. (One reason Medicare Advantage plans can offer such enhanced services is because the federal government gives them additional payments compared to original Medicare.) The inspector general’s report highlights one of Medicare Advantage’s downsides.

“Beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage may not be aware that there may be greater barriers to accessing certain types of health care services in Medicare Advantage than in original Medicare,” the report states.

One example highlighted in the report tells of a Medicare Advantage plan that refused to approve a follow-up MRI to find out whether an adrenal lesion was malignant because the lesion was allegedly too small. In fact, Medicare’s rules do not restrict the use of follow-up MRIs based on the size of a lesion. (The plan reversed its initial denial on appeal.)

Denial Appeals Can Work

The report identified two common causes of service denials. First, even though Medicare Advantage plans’ clinical criteria cannot be “more restrictive” than Medicare’s coverage rules, plans often used tighter clinical criteria, such as requiring an x-ray before approving more advanced imaging. Second, plans often claimed that the request for services lacked sufficient documentation, even though investigators who reviewed the denied claims found that the existing medical records were sufficient to support the request.

When a Medicare Advantage plan denies a preauthorization or payment request, the beneficiary can file an appeal with the plan.  The inspector general found that when a beneficiary or provider appealed or disputed the denial of a service that met Medicare’s coverage rules, plans sometimes reversed the denial.  And in certain cases, Medicare Advantage plans corrected their own errors.

The inspector general’s report offers several recommendations for the Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services, which oversees Medicare Advantage plans, including better auditing of plans.   

To read the inspector general’s report, “Some Medicare Advantage Organization Denials of Prior Authorization Requests Raise Concerns About Beneficiary Access to Medically Necessary Care,” click here.  

Advocates Sound Alarm About Pilot Program They Say Could Privatize All of Medicare

The Biden administration is moving forward with a Trump-era pilot program that would hand over the care of millions of Medicare beneficiaries to private, mostly for-profit, groups. 

Health care advocates warn that that the little-known plan will limit patients’ choice of providers and effectively privatize Medicare for beneficiaries who specifically chose traditional, public Medicare because they wanted to be able to select their own doctors. The program was created without congressional oversight and can expand without Congress’s approval.

“It could potentially complete the privatization of our public precious good called Medicare,” says Ed Weisbart, MD, who chairs the Missouri chapter of Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP). “It violates the spirit of a public health program, which Medicare is, by driving larger corporate profits as a priority over improving our health, which Medicare is remarkably successful at.”

Already, some 42 percent of Medicare beneficiaries are in private Medicare Advantage plans, to which the federal government gives a fixed monthly fee for each Medicare beneficiary under the plan’s care. The less money the plans spend on patient care, the more money they and their investors make.

The new pilot program, called Direct Contracting, would extend key aspects of this model to other Medicare beneficiaries in 38 states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico, potentially covering 30 million of the 36 million beneficiaries in traditional Medicare.  Fifty-three Direct Contracting Entities (DCEs), most of which are investor-owned with ties to Medicare Advantage commercial insurers, have already signed contracts to be fiscal intermediaries between patients and their providers.

Beneficiaries Automatically Enrolled

Under the program, these DCEs will form their own networks of providers, which beneficiaries will be strongly encouraged, although not required, to use.  Traditional Medicare beneficiaries will be enrolled in these networks, often without their knowledge or consent.  The DCEs will be paid a set amount per patient, called a capitation payment, which will vary depending on a patient’s “risk score.”  If the patient care costs less than the per-patient amount, the DCE keeps some or all of the difference.  If it costs more, the DCE loses money.

Beneficiaries will not be able to opt out of being “aligned” with a DCE.  Medicare will assist the DCEs by searching the claims history of beneficiaries – again without patients’ knowledge or consent -- to see if they have visited a participating DCE provider with which they could be aligned.

All this will likely be confusing for Medicare beneficiaries, many of whom will have three different entities processing their claims: the DCE, Medicare, and the beneficiary’s Medicare supplemental insurance (Medigap) plan.

“Rather than allowing patients to go to providers directly under traditional Medicare, DCEs invite insurers and investors to step in and interfere with the care that Americans get,” said Rep. Katie Porter (D-CA) at a recent PHNP webinar on Direct Contracting. The DCEs, Porter charged, will “drive up costs for patients in order to maximize profits . . . Wall Street wins, patients and taxpayers lose.” 

Lowering Costs Is the Stated Aim . . .

The idea behind the pilot is that these care networks will lower costs and spur innovation by managing care.  The model, according to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), “is expected to increase beneficiaries’ access to innovative, affordable care while maintaining all original Medicare benefits.”

Not all medical providers oppose Direct Contracting, particularly those already affiliated with provider groups.

“Models of care that are focused on systems of reimbursement such as capitation and holding physicians accountable for cost, coordination, and quality are integral to moving away from the fee-for-service model and toward more transformative models of care that reward value,” said Don Crane, president and CEO, of America’s Physician Groups said in December 2020.

. . . But Financial Incentives Worry Critics

Critics of the program have raised a number of concerns.  They note that many beneficiaries will be unaware that they can opt out of a DCE’s provider network, and say that DCEs will seek to contain costs by discouraging or denying needed care. (It is unclear how CMS will monitor beneficiaries’ access to care.)

Advocates also note that, as with Medicare Advantage, DCEs will have a strong financial incentive to “upcode” patients – that is, to tell the government that patients in their care are sicker than they really are so the DCE can receive a higher reimbursement.  Finally, critics are convinced that DCEs affiliated with Medicare Advantage plans will use the opportunity to steer beneficiaries away from traditional Medicare and into these highly lucrative plans.

No one knows whether the DCEs will actually be profitable, but Wall Street is betting that they will be.

“Wall Street considers Direct Contracting Entities to be eight times more valuable per patient than Medicare Advantage firms,” wrote Chris Tomlinson, a business columnist for the Houston Chronicle. 

Even if DCEs don’t make money initially, patient advocates say that many investors are betting on selling the DCE for a profit down the road, a favored model of private equity investment.  “The real strategy is to make rapid growth and then leave and go on to the next investment,” said PNHP’s Weisbart.

Two nationally known physicians who once led CMS are warning against the pilot program. Writing in the blog of the journal Health Affairs, Dr. Donald M. Berwick, a former CMS Administrator, and Dr. Richard Gilfillan, a former director of CMS’s Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, call Direct Contracting a new addition to the “Medicare Money Machine” and characterize its name as “Orwellian.”  “‘Indirect Contracting’ would have been a far more accurate name,” they write, “since the cornerstone of the program was CMS’s opening the door to non-provider-controlled [DCEs] to become the fiscal intermediaries between patients and providers.”

Blanket Authority to Experiment

Experimental health delivery models like Direct Contracting were made possible by the Affordable Care Act.  The landmark 2008 law established the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation and gave it almost blanket authority to test ways to improve health care quality and reduce costs without congressional approval or oversight.  The Trump administration seized on this authority to craft the Direct Contracting model. 

Its most extreme version is called Geographic Direct Contracting, which would auto-assign every traditional Medicare beneficiary living in a number of large geographic regions into a Medicare Advantage-like “Geo DCE” without the right to opt out. Advocates persuaded the Biden administration to pause this program in March, although it is still “under review” and could resurface. 

But the Biden administration has continued the rollout of a less extreme version, the Global and Professional Direct Contracting (GPDC), which CMS calls a “voluntary risk-sharing payment model.”

Rep. Porter is among lawmakers who are calling on the administration to immediately freeze this version as well, contending that while it is intended to make Medicare more efficient, it actually will do the opposite, noting that between 2008 and 2020 the federal government has overpaid Medicare Advantage plans -- which were designed to contain costs in similar ways – by $143 billion.

In late November a group of physicians from around the nation traveled to Washington, D.C., to educate lawmakers about the Direct Contracting threat, call for a congressional hearing and present U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra a petition signed by more than 13,000 people, including 1,500 physicians.  The petition warns that moving the DCE program forward threatens “the future of Medicare as we know it.”

“[Direct Contracting] is very complex and it is extremely hard to explain,” said PNHP board member Dr. Judy Albert at the HHS press event.  “There has been very little coverage in the mainstream media, allowing the program to fly under the radar. . . . Together, we will continue to raise the alarm until we stop this threat to Medicare.”

Medicare Premiums to Increase Dramatically in 2022

Medicare premiums are rising sharply next year, cutting into the large Social Security cost-of-living increase. The basic monthly premium will jump 15.5 percent, or $21.60, from $148.50 to $170.10 a month.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced the premium and other Medicare cost increases on November 12, 2021. The steep hike is attributed to increasing health care costs and uncertainty over Medicare’s outlay for an expensive new drug that was recently approved to treat Alzheimer’s disease. Because most recipients have their Medicare premium deducted from their Social Security check, the upswing in Medicare premiums means that the Social Security cost-of-living increase of 5.9 percent, which was the largest in 39 years, will be smaller for most people. 

While the majority of beneficiaries will pay the added amount, a "hold harmless" rule prevents Medicare recipients' premiums from increasing more than Social Security benefits. This “hold harmless” provision does not apply to Medicare beneficiaries who are enrolled in Medicare but not yet receiving Social Security, new Medicare beneficiaries, seniors earning more than $91,000 a year, and "dual eligibles" who get both Medicare and Medicaid benefits.

Meanwhile, the Part B deductible will rise $30, from $203 to $233 in 2022, while the Part A deductible will go up by $72, to $1,556. For beneficiaries receiving skilled care in a nursing home, Medicare's coinsurance for days 21-100 will increase from $185.50 to $194.50. Medicare coverage ends after day 100.   

Here are all the new Medicare payment figures:

• Part B premium: $170.10 (was $148.50)
• Part B deductible: $233 (was $203)
• Part A deductible: $1,556 (was $1,484)
• Co-payment for hospital stay days 61-90: $389/day (was $371)
• Co-payment for hospital stay days 91 and beyond: $778/day (was $742)
• Skilled nursing facility co-payment, days 21-100: $194.50/day (was $185.50)

Your "Medigap" policy may cover some of these costs. 

Premiums for higher-income beneficiaries ($91,000 and above) are as follows: 

• Individuals with annual incomes between $91,000 and $114,000 and married couples with annual incomes between $182,000 and $228,000 will pay a monthly premium of $238.10.
• Individuals with annual incomes between $114,000 and $142,000 and married couples with annual incomes between $228,000 and $2846,000 will pay a monthly premium of $340.20.
• Individuals with annual incomes between $142,000 and $170,000 and married couples with annual incomes between $284,000 and $340,000 will pay a monthly premium of $442.30.
• Individuals with annual incomes above $170,000 and less than $500,000 and married couples with annual incomes above $340,000 and less than $750,000 will pay a monthly premium of $544.30.
• Individuals with annual incomes above $500,000 and married couples with annual incomes above $750,000 will pay a monthly premium of $578.30.

Rates differ for beneficiaries who are married but file a separate tax return from their spouse. Those with incomes greater than $91,000 and less than $409,000 will pay a monthly premium of $544.30. Those with incomes greater than $409,000 will pay a monthly premium of $578.30.

The Social Security Administration uses the income reported two years ago to determine a Part B beneficiary's premium. This means that the income reported on a beneficiary's 2020 tax return is used to determine whether the beneficiary must pay a higher monthly Part B premium in 2022. Income is calculated by taking a beneficiary's adjusted gross income and adding back in some normally excluded income, such as tax-exempt interest, U.S. savings bond interest used to pay tuition, and certain income from foreign sources. This is called modified adjusted gross income (MAGI). If your MAGI decreased significantly in the past two years, you may request that information from more recent years be used to calculate the premium. You can also request to reverse a surcharge if your income changes.

Those who enroll in Medicare Advantage plans may have different cost-sharing arrangements. CMS estimates that the Medicare Advantage average monthly premium will be lower in 2022, from an average of $21 in 2021 to $19 in 2022.

For Medicare’s press release announcing the new premium, co-payment and deductible amounts for 2022, click here.

In 2022, Social Security Beneficiaries Will See the Biggest Increase in 39 Years

The year was 1983: The U.S. invaded Granada. A gallon of gas cost 96 cents. Michael Jackson’s ‘Thriller’ video premiered. That year was also the last time that Social Security recipients saw a cost-of-living increase steeper than the one just announced for 2022. This year, Social Security benefits will rise 5.9 percent, the sharpest upsurge since 1983’s 7.4 percent jump. 

Cost-of-living increases are tied to the consumer price index, and rising inflation rates and gas prices caused by the ongoing coronavirus pandemic mean Social Security recipients will get a large boost in 2022. The 5.9 percent increase dwarfs last year’s 1.3 percent rise, and over the past decade hikes have averaged just 1.65 percent. The average monthly benefit of $1,565 in 2021 will go up by $92 a month to $1,657 a month for an individual beneficiary, or $19,884 yearly. 

The cost-of-living change also affects the maximum amount of earnings subject to the Social Security tax, which will grow from $142,800 to $147,000.

For 2022, the monthly federal Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payment standard will be $841 for an individual and $1,261 for a couple.

Part of the increase will be eaten up by higher Medicare Part B premiums, however. The standard monthly premium for Medicare Part B enrollees has not been announced yet, but it is projected to rise $10 a month to $158.30.  And the 5.9 percent Social Security increase may not be enough for seniors to keep pace with rising health care and prescription drug costs.

“You’re glad that you get a 5.9 percent increase, but it doesn’t feel like you’re getting 5.9 percent when all of your other costs are going up much higher,” said Nancy Altman, president of the advocacy group Social Security Works.

Most beneficiaries will be able to find out their specific cost-of-living adjustment online by logging on to my Social Security in December 2021. While you can still receive your increase notice by mail, you have the option to get the notice online instead.

For more on the 2022 Social Security benefit levels, click here.